Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673863›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2021

Predictors of failure with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter observational study.

Ricard Mellado-Artigas, Luis Eduardo Mujica, Magda Liliana Ruiz, Bruno Leonel Ferreyro, Federico Angriman, Egoitz Arruti, Antoni Torres, Enric Barbeta, Jesús Villar, Carlos Ferrando and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on clinical outcomes in adults with COVID-19: A systematic review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ricard Mellado-ArtigasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clínic, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Villarroel 170, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. rmartigas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-6819
Luis Eduardo MujicaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Magda Liliana RuizDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Bruno Leonel FerreyroInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Federico AngrimanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Egoitz ArrutiUbikare Technology, Vizcaya, Spain.
Antoni TorresDepartment of Respirology, Hospital Clínic, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.
Enric BarbetaDepartment of Respirology, Hospital Clínic, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús VillarCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos FerrandoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clínic, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Villarroel 170, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
COVID-19 Spanish ICU Network

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research Vanier Canada Graduate ScholarshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III (#CB06/06/1088; #PI16/00049; #PI18/01611; #PI19/00141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to describe the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure and factors associated with a shift to invasive mechanical ventilation.

methodsThis is a multicenter, observational study from a prospectively collected database of consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs) who received HFNO on ICU admission during a 22-week period (March 12-August 13, 2020). Outcomes of interest were factors on the day of ICU admission associated with the need for endotracheal intubation. We used multivariable logistic regression and mixed effects models. A predictive model for endotracheal intubation in patients treated with HFNO was derived and internally validated.

resultsFrom a total of 259 patients initially treated with HFNO, 140 patients (54%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Baseline non-respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [odds ratio (OR) 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.35], and the ROX index calculated as the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction divided by respiratory rate (OR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72), and pH (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.86) were associated with intubation. Hospital site explained 1% of the variability in the likelihood of intubation after initial treatment with HFNO. A predictive model including non-respiratory SOFA score and the ROX index showed excellent performance (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96).

conclusionsAmong adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 initially treated with HFNO, the SOFA score and the ROX index may help to identify patients with higher likelihood of intubation.

Indexed as

COVID-19High-flow nasal oxygen therapyHypoxemic respiratory failureInvasive mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID33673863
PMCPMC7934982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.