ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021
Validation of preimplantation genetic tests for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with DNA from spent culture media (SCM): concordance assessment and implication.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of non-invasive gene detection in preimplantation embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Pooled it
- "Old and new" frontiers in embryo viability assessment: current practices and introduction of emerging approaches.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Analysis of Zona-Associated Sperm as a Potential Source of ExogenousAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Association of Sleeve Gastrectomy With the Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Application of non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy through spent embryo culture media analysis at 48 and 54 hours after embryo cleavage.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Validation of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) in a Japanese population: experience from seven clinics.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT) Compared to Invasive Embryo Biopsy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in blastocyst culture medium.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Infertility: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Genes · 2025Review
- A novel non-invasive embryo evaluation method (NICS-Timelapse) with enhanced predictive precision and clinical impact.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: A literature review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Review
- The use of voting ensembles to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to predict embryo ploidy status.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Non-invasive evaluation of embryo quality for the selection of transferable embryos in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2022Article
- An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo.Current genomics · 2022Review
- Incidence, dynamics and recurrences of reverse cleavage in aneuploid, mosaic and euploid blastocysts, and its relationship with embryo quality.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing: a literature review.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpent culture medium (SCM) as a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic tests aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been widely discussed.
methodsSeventy-five blastocysts that were donated for research provided a unique possibility in which multiple specimens, including trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, SCM, and paired corresponding whole blastocyst (WB) specimens from the same blastocyst source, could be utilized for the purpose of this preclinical validation.
resultsTo conduct a validation ploidy concordance assessment, we evaluated the full chromosomal concordance rates between SCM and WB (SCM-to-WB), and between TE and WB (TE-to-WB) as well as sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy. 78.67% (59/75) of NGS results in the SCM group were interpretable, a significantly lower percentage than their corresponding TE and WB groups. This discrepancy manifests itself in intrinsically low quantity and poor integrity DNA from SCM. Subsequently, remarkable differences in full concordance rates (including mosaicism, and segmental aneuploidies) are seen as follows: 32.2% (SCM-to-WB, 19/59) and 69.33% (TE-to-WB, 52/75), (p < 0.001). In such cases, full concordance rates were 27.27% (15/55) in SCM-to-WB, and, 76% (57/75) in TE-to-WB (p < 0.001). Collectively, the NGS data from SCM also translated into lower sensitivities, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), overall diagnostic accuracies, and higher Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR).
conclusionsOur study reveals that DNA is detectable in the majority of SCM samples. Individual chromosomal aberration, such as segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, can be quantitatively and qualitatively measured. However, TE still provides a more accurate and reliable high-throughput methodology for PGT-A. Meanwhile, cell-free DNA in SCM reporting lacks uniform diagnostic interpretations. Considering that this test is meant to determine which embryos are relegated to be discarded, PGT-A with cell-free DNA in SCM should not be permitted to be applied in routine clinical settings for diagnosis purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.