Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673833›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

How do Muslim community members perceive Covid-19 risk reduction recommendations - a UK qualitative study?

Shaima M Hassan, Adele Ring, Naheed Tahir, Mark Gabbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaima M HassanInstitute of Population Health Sciences. Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, England. s.m.hassan@liverpool.ac.uk.
Adele RingInstitute of Population Health Sciences. Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, England.
Naheed TahirNIHR Applied Research Collaboration NWC, Liverpool, England.
Mark GabbayInstitute of Population Health Sciences. Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe evidence is now unequivocal that people from Black and Minority Ethnic Backgrounds (BAME) living in the UK are disproportionately affected by covid-19. There is growing evidence that the reasons for this difference are multi-factorial and need further exploration.

aimThe aim of this study was to understand better, perceptions of risk and responses to covid-19 of members of the Muslim community living in the North West of England, and to understand the facilitators and barriers to adherence to restrictions and guidance measures.

methodA total of 47 participants took part in 25 in-depth qualitative interviews and four focus groups (n=22) that explored perceptions of risk and responses to risk from covid-19. Data were analysed thematically.

findingsParticipants were aware of the mechanism of transmission of covid-19 and took steps to mitigate risk of transmission including, observing a range of hygiene practices and following social distancing guidance. Increased risk of covid-19 for BAME populations was explained largely in terms of exposure to the virus due to the types of employment people from BAME populations are employed in. Limitations both within the working environment and more generally in public spaces, was identified as problematic for effective social distancing. The closure of mosques sent out a strong message about the seriousness of the virus and religious teachings reinforced hygiene and social distancing guidelines.

conclusionAcross society there are people that adhere to restrictions and guidelines and those that do not. Improving local information provision and communication pathways during times of the pandemic, could aid understanding of risk and promote adherence to social distancing restrictions.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack PeopleCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19EthnicityFemaleFocus GroupsHealth BehaviorHumansIslamMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsCommunicationCOVID-19Health behavioursMuslim communityRisk

Identifiers

PMID33673833
PMCPMC7935005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.