Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673823›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Sniffer dogs as a screening/diagnostic tool for COVID-19: a proof of concept study.

Esmaeil Eskandari, Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh, Hassan Roudgari, Ramin Hamidi Farahani, Amir Nezami-Asl, Reza Laripour, Helen Aliyazdi, Arasb Dabbagh Moghaddam, Ramin Zibaseresht, Hossein Akbarialiabad and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Development of a safety protocol for training and using SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs: A pilot study.Journal of veterinary behavior : clinical applications and research : official journal of : Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, International Working Dog Breeding Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission and detection.Eco-Environment & Health · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Esmaeil Eskandari *Researcher Relief and rescue Organization and SK9 Dogs Training School, Red crescent society of Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh *Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan RoudgariGenomics Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin Hamidi FarahaniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Nezami-AslMedical Faculty of Aerospace and Subaquatic Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza LaripourResearcher Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Helen AliyazdiResearch Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Arasb Dabbagh MoghaddamResearcher Department of Food Science, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin ZibasereshtDepartment of Chemistry (Christchurch) and Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Canterbury and Maritime University of Imam Khomeini, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein AkbarialiabadShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mojtaba Yousefi ZoshkDepartment of Pediatrics, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreza ShiriIslamic Azad University, Share-Qods Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi ShiriResearcher Toxicology Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dr.mhdshiri@gmail.com.
Aja University of Medical Sciences · IRAerospace Research Institute · IRImam Khomeini Hospital · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Qods Branch · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Rajaee Teacher Training University · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

aja university of medical sciences IR.AJAUMS.REC.139.055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSniffer dogs are able to detect certain chemical particles and are suggest to be capable of helping diagnose some medical conditions and complications, such as colorectal cancer, melanoma, bladder cancer, and even critical states such as hypoglycemia in diabetic patients. With the global spread of COVID-19 throughout the world and the need to have a real-time screening of the population, especially in crowded places, this study aimed to investigate the applicability of sniffer dogs to carry out such a task.

methodsFirstly, three male and female dogs from German shepherd (Saray), German black (Kuzhi) and Labrador (Marco) breeds had been intensively trained throughout the classical conditioning method for 7 weeks. They were introduced to human specimens obtained from the throat and pharyngeal secretions of participants who were already reported positive or negative for SARS-COV-2 infection be RT-PCR. Each dog underwent the conditioning process for almost 1000 times. In the meantime another similar condition process was conducted on clothes and masks of COVID-19 patient using another three male and female dogs from Labrador (Lexi), Border gypsy (Sami), and Golden retriever (Zhico) breeds. In verification test for the first three dogs, 80 pharyngeal secretion samples consisting of 26 positive and 54 negative samples from different medical centers who underwent RT-PCR test were in a single-blind method. In the second verification test for the other three dogs, masks and clothes of 50 RT-PCR positive and 70 RT-PCR negative cases from different medical center were used.

resultsIn verification test using pharyngeal secretion, the sniffer dogs' detection capability was associated with a 65% of sensitivity and 89% of specificity and they amanged to identify 17 out of the 26 positive and 48 out of the 54 true negative samples. In the next verification test using patients' face masks and clothes, 43 out of the 50 positive samples were correctly identified by the dogs. Moreover, out of the 70 negative samples, 65 samples were correctly found to be negative. The sensitivity of this test was as high as 86% and its specificity was 92.9%. In addition, the positive and negative predictive values were 89.6 and 90.3%, respectively.

conclusionDogs are capable of being trained to identify COVID-19 cases by sniffing their odour, so they can be used as a reliable tool in limited screening.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Working DogsAnimalsCOVID-19 TestingDogsFemaleHumansIranMaleMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsProof of Concept StudySensitivity and SpecificitySingle-Blind MethodCovid-19DiagnosisHealthPharyngeal secretionsScreenSniffer dogs

Identifiers

PMID33673823
PMCPMC7934999
OpenAlexW3102396990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.