Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673755›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2021

Harm Reduction for Adolescents and Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Community Care in Reach.

Elizabeth Noyes, Ellis Yeo, Megan Yerton, Isabel Plakas, Susan Keyes, Aura Obando, Jessie M Gaeta, Elsie M Taveras, Avik Chatterjee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mobile addiction treatment units: a narrative review.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Noyes1811 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ellis Yeo124049 Harvard College, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Megan Yerton2348 Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Isabel Plakas50960 Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
Susan Keyes50960 Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
Aura Obando1811 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessie M Gaeta50960 Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
Elsie M Taveras1811 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Avik Chatterjee50960 Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBoston University · USHarvard College Observatory · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the ability of harm reduction programs to provide vital services to adolescents, young adults, and people who use drugs, thereby increasing the risk of overdose, infection, withdrawal, and other complications of drug use. To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on harm reduction services for adolescents and young adults in Boston, we conducted a quantitative assessment of the Community Care in Reach (CCIR) youth pilot program to determine gaps in services created by its closure during the peak of the pandemic (March 19-June 21, 2020). We also conducted semistructured interviews with staff members at 6 harm reduction programs in Boston from April 27 through May 4, 2020, to identify gaps in harm reduction services, changes in substance use practices and patterns of engagement with people who use drugs, and how harm reduction programs adapted to pandemic conditions. During the pandemic, harm reduction programs struggled to maintain staffing, supplies, infection control measures, and regular connection with their participants. During the 3-month suspension of CCIR mobile van services, CCIR missed an estimated 363 contacts, 169 units of naloxone distributed, and 402 syringes distributed. Based on our findings, we propose the following recommendations for sustaining harm reduction services during times of crisis: pursuing high-level policy changes to eliminate political barriers to care and fund harm reduction efforts; enabling and empowering harm reduction programs to innovatively and safely distribute vital resources and build community during a crisis; and providing comprehensive support to people to minimize drug-related harms.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionAdolescentBostonCommunity Health ServicesCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityHumansNaloxoneNeedle-Exchange ProgramsSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultNaloxoneadolescentCOVID-19harm reductionopioid epidemicopioid-related disorderssubstance useyoung adultyouth

Identifiers

PMID33673755
PMCPMC8580390
OpenAlexW3133883083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.