Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673740›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2021

Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute.

János Németh, Beáta Tapasztó, Wagih A Aclimandos, Philippe Kestelyn, Jost B Jonas, Jan-Tjeerd H N De Faber, Ingrida Januleviciene, Andrzej Grzybowski, Zoltán Zsolt Nagy, Olavi Pärssinen and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Influence of Cycloplegia on Axial Length Prediction Models in a Paediatric Sample.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

János NémethDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-4888
Beáta TapasztóDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Wagih A AclimandosKing's College Hospital, London, UK.
Philippe KestelynDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Jost B JonasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jan-Tjeerd H N De FaberRotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingrida JanulevicieneLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-7922
Andrzej GrzybowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Zoltán Zsolt NagyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Olavi PärssinenGerontology Research Centre and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Jeremy A GuggenheimSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Peter M AllenVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Rigmor C BaraasNational Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Kathryn J SaundersCentre for Optometry and Vision Science research, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-5731
Daniel Ian FlitcroftTemple Street Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lyle S GrayGlasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Jan Roelof PollingDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annechien Eg HaarmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-5700
J Willem L TidemanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
James Stuart WolffsohnOptometry and Vision Science, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Siegfried WahlInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3437-6711
Jeroen A MulderDepartment of Optometry and Orthoptics, Hogeschool Utrecht, University of Applied Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Irina Yurievna SmirnovaSiberian Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Myopia "Glazka", Novosibirsk, Russia.
Marino FormentiDepartment of Physics, School of Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Hema RadhakrishnanThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Serge ResnikoffSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-4446
Semmelweis University · HUErasmus MC · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLAnglia Ruskin University · GBAston University · GBBrien Holden Vision Institute · AUCardiff University · GBCarl Zeiss (Germany) · DEGlasgow Caledonian University · GBHeidelberg University · DEKing's College Hospital · GBLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTRotterdam Eye Hospital · NLTemple Street Children's University Hospital · IEUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NOUniversity of Ulster · GBUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of myopia is increasing extensively worldwide. The number of people with myopia in 2020 is predicted to be 2.6 billion globally, which is expected to rise up to 4.9 billion by 2050, unless preventive actions and interventions are taken. The number of individuals with high myopia is also increasing substantially and pathological myopia is predicted to become the most common cause of irreversible vision impairment and blindness worldwide and also in Europe. These prevalence estimates indicate the importance of reducing the burden of myopia by means of myopia control interventions to prevent myopia onset and to slow down myopia progression. Due to the urgency of the situation, the European Society of Ophthalmology decided to publish this update of the current information and guidance on management of myopia. The pathogenesis and genetics of myopia are also summarized and epidemiology, risk factors, preventive and treatment options are discussed in details.

Indexed as

Myopia, DegenerativeOphthalmologyOrthokeratologic ProceduresDisease ProgressionHumansPrevalenceatropineblindnessMyopiamyopia reduction interventionsorthokeratologypathologic myopiapreventive medicinetime spent outdoors

Identifiers

PMID33673740
PMCPMC8369912
OpenAlexW3135799304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.