Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673602›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Comparison of Decellularization Protocols to Generate Peripheral Nerve Grafts: A Study on Rat Sciatic Nerves.

Marwa El Soury, Óscar Darío García-García, Matteo Moretti, Isabelle Perroteau, Stefania Raimondo, Arianna Barbara Lovati, Víctor Carriel

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ComprehensiveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marwa El SouryDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8335-1193
Óscar Darío García-GarcíaTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4710-0733
Matteo MorettiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Cell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Isabelle PerroteauDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Stefania RaimondoDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-473X
Arianna Barbara LovatiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Cell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, 20161 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-9718
Víctor CarrielTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-5644
Universidad de Granada · ESEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino 2017.AI190.U219"Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación P18-RT-5059"Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (In-stituto de Salud Carlos III)" FIS PI17-0393 and FIS PI20-0318"Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014-2020, Universidad de Granada, Junta de Andalucía, España" A-CTS-498-UGR18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critical nerve gap repair, decellularized nerve allografts are considered a promising tissue engineering strategy that can provide superior regeneration results compared to nerve conduits. Decellularized nerves offer a well-conserved extracellular matrix component that has proven to play an important role in supporting axonal guiding and peripheral nerve regeneration. Up to now, the known decellularized techniques are time and effort consuming. The present study, performed on rat sciatic nerves, aims at investigating a novel nerve decellularization protocol able to combine an effective decellularization in short time with a good preservation of the extracellular matrix component. To do this, a decellularization protocol proven to be efficient for tendons (DN-P1) was compared with a decellularization protocol specifically developed for nerves (DN-P2). The outcomes of both the decellularization protocols were assessed by a series of in vitro evaluations, including qualitative and quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analyses, DNA quantification, SEM and TEM ultrastructural analyses, mechanical testing, and viability assay. The overall results showed that DN-P1 could provide promising results if tested in vivo, as the in vitro characterization demonstrated that DN-P1 conserved a better ultrastructure and ECM components compared to DN-P2. Most importantly, DN-P1 was shown to be highly biocompatible, supporting a greater number of viable metabolically active cells.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAllograftsAnimalsCell SeparationExtracellular MatrixFemaleRatsRats, WistarSciatic NerveTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldsacellulardecellularizationextracellular matrixorthopedic traumaperipheral nervesregeneration

Identifiers

PMID33673602
PMCPMC7957587
OpenAlexW3133774497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.