Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673447›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optimization and Validation of a Classification Algorithm for Assessment of Physical Activity in Hospitalized Patients.

Hanneke C van Dijk-Huisman, Wouter Bijnens, Rachel Senden, Johannes M N Essers, Kenneth Meijer, Jos Aarts, Antoine F Lenssen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931068 (Pre- and Postoperative Energy Expenditure in Major Liver Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931068 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pre- and Postoperative Energy Expenditure in Major Liver Resection: What do we Ask From a Patient?

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademisch Ziekenhuis MaastrichtRan2023 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsCancer, Liver Diseases, Liver NeoplasmsArmsPre- and postoperative assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanneke C van Dijk-HuismanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4513-6935
Wouter BijnensInstrument Development, Engineering and Evaluation, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rachel SendenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9463-5749
Johannes M N EssersDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-3167
Kenneth MeijerDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-8754
Jos AartsInstrument Development, Engineering and Evaluation, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Antoine F LenssenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-4452
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

Health~Holland LSHM18071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low amounts of physical activity (PA) and prolonged periods of sedentary activity are common in hospitalized patients. Objective PA monitoring is needed to prevent the negative effects of inactivity, but a suitable algorithm is lacking. The aim of this study is to optimize and validate a classification algorithm that discriminates between sedentary, standing, and dynamic activities, and records postural transitions in hospitalized patients under free-living conditions. Optimization and validation in comparison to video analysis were performed in orthopedic and acutely hospitalized elderly patients with an accelerometer worn on the upper leg. Data segmentation window size (WS), amount of PA threshold (PA Th) and sensor orientation threshold (SO Th) were optimized in 25 patients, validation was performed in another 25. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and (absolute) percentage error were used to assess the algorithm's performance. Optimization resulted in the best performance with parameter settings: WS 4 s, PA Th 4.3 counts per second, SO Th 0.8 g. Validation showed that all activities were classified within acceptable limits (>80% sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, ±10% error), except for the classification of standing activity. As patients need to increase their PA and interrupt sedentary behavior, the algorithm is suitable for classifying PA in hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseInpatientsAgedAlgorithmsHospitalizationHumansSedentary Behavioraccelerometersalgorithmhospitalized patientsphysical activityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33673447
PMCPMC7956397
OpenAlexW3134792573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.