Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673305›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Clinical

Tessa A M Mulder, Mirjam de With, Marzia Del Re, Romano Danesi, Ron H J Mathijssen, Ron H N van Schaik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa A M MulderDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0698-785X
Mirjam de WithDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9953-7945
Marzia Del ReDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-6161
Romano DanesiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-8934
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5667-5697
Ron H N van SchaikDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Pisa · ITErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen is a major option for adjuvant endocrine treatment in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients. The conversion of the prodrug tamoxifen into the most active metabolite endoxifen is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Genetic variation in the

Indexed as

CYP2D6Cytochrome P450 2D6genotypingPGxPharmacogeneticsreviewtamoxifentamoxifen treatment

Identifiers

PMID33673305
PMCPMC7917604
OpenAlexW3131226910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.