Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673137›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Enhancing SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface with Two-Step Task-Related Component Analysis.

Hyeon Kyu Lee, Young-Seok Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyeon Kyu LeeDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea.
Young-Seok ChoiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-7093

Funding

Kwangwoon University 2020-0306National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1F1A1045607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among various methods for frequency recognition of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) study, a task-related component analysis (TRCA), which extracts discriminative spatial filters for classifying electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, has gathered much interest. The TRCA-based SSVEP method yields lower computational cost and higher classification performance compared to existing SSVEP methods. In spite of its utility, the TRCA-based SSVEP method still suffers from the degradation of the frequency recognition rate in cases where EEG signals with a short length window are used. To address this issue, here, we propose an improved strategy for decoding SSVEPs, which is insensitive to a window length by carrying out two-step TRCA. The proposed method reuses the spatial filters corresponding to target frequencies generated by the TRCA. Followingly, the proposed method accentuates features for target frequencies by correlating individual template and test data. For the evaluation of the performance of the proposed method, we used a benchmark dataset with 35 subjects and confirmed significantly improved performance comparing with other existing SSVEP methods. These results imply the suitability as an efficient frequency recognition strategy for SSVEP-based BCI applications.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualAlgorithmsHumansPhotic StimulationPhysical Phenomenabrain-computer interface (BCI)canonical correlation analysis (CCA)electroencephalography (EEG)steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)task-related component analysis (TRCA)two-step task-related component analysis (TSTRCA)

Identifiers

PMID33673137
PMCPMC7918701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.