ReviewCancers2021
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04831983 (Single-Dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single-Dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Focal Boost to the MRI-defined Macroscopic Tumor Volume for Intermediate Unfavorable and High Risk Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate and pelvic SABR with or without a focal boost: results from a multicenter phase II prospective clinical trial.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
- Biochemical control and 2-year tolerability following stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a multicenter study in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Observational
- Acute toxicity and quality of life in postoperative prostate cancer patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
- A retrospective comparative evaluation of rectal preparation strategies for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Research Progress of SBRT Combined With Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.American journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Prognostic significance of the mEPE score in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated robotic SBRT.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Article
- Predicting acute and late toxicity in prostate cancer stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: the role of dosimetric parameters and prostate volume.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Article
- Validation of a Novel Data-Driven Algorithm to Detect Atypical Prescriptions in Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Linac-based versus MR-guided SBRT for localized prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation of acute tolerability.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Prostate only radiotherapy using external beam radiotherapy: A clinician's perspective.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Dosimetric Comparison of Ultra-Hypofractionated and Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy Boosts for Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Overview of the current role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2022Article
- Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Hitting Harder, Faster, and Smarter in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Treatment Strategies for High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced and Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is an established, potentially curative treatment option for all risk constellations of localized prostate cancer (PCA). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and dose-escalated RT can further improve outcome in high-risk (HR) PCA. In recent years, shorter RT schedules based on hypofractionated RT have shown equal outcome. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly conformal RT technique enabling ultra-hypofractionation which has been shown to be safe and efficient in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCA. There is a paucity of data on the role of SBRT in HR PCA. In particular, the need for pelvic elective nodal irradiation (ENI) needs to be addressed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the available data on observed toxicities, ADT prescription practice, and oncological outcome to shed more light on the value of SBRT in HR PCA.
methodsWe searched the PubMed and Embase electronic databases for the terms "prostate cancer" AND "stereotactic" AND "radiotherapy" in June 2020. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.
resultsAfter a rigorous selection process, we identified 18 individual studies meeting all selection criteria for further analyses. Five additional studies were included because their content was judged as relevant. Three trials have reported on prostate SBRT including pelvic nodes; 2 with ENI and 1 with positive pelvic nodes only. The remaining studies investigated SBRT of the prostate only. Grade 2+ acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity was between 12% and 46.7% in the studies investigating pelvic nodes irradiation and ranged from 0% to 89% in the prostate only studies. Grade 2+ chronic GU toxicity was between 7% and 60% vs. 2% and 56.7%. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) grade 2+ toxicity was between 0% to 4% and 0% to 18% for studies with and without pelvic nodes irradiation, respectively. Chronic GI grade 2+ toxicity rates were between 4% and 50.1% vs. 0% and 40%. SBRT of prostate and positive pelvic nodes only showed similar toxicity rates as SBRT for the prostate only. Among the trials that reported on ADT use, the majority of HR PCA patients underwent ADT for at least 2 months; mostly neoadjuvant and concurrent. Biochemical control rates ranged from 82% to 100% after 2 years and 56% to 100% after 3 years. Only a few studies reported longer follow-up data.
conclusionAt this point, SBRT with or without pelvic ENI cannot be considered the standard of care in HR PCA, due to missing level 1 evidence. Treatment may be offered to selected patients at specialized centers with access to high-precision RT. While concomitant ADT is the current standard of care, the necessary duration of ADT in combination with SBRT remains unclear. Ideally, all eligible patients should be enrolled in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.