Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673077›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Robert Foerster, Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen, Andre Buchali, Hongjian Tang, Christina Schroeder, Paul Windisch, Erwin Vu, Sati Akbaba, Tilman Bostel, Tanja Sprave and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04831983 (Single-Dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04831983 recruitingnot on this map

Single-Dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Focal Boost to the MRI-defined Macroscopic Tumor Volume for Intermediate Unfavorable and High Risk Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2021 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biochemical control and 2-year tolerability following stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a multicenter study in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognostic significance of the mEPE score in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated robotic SBRT.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert FoersterInstitute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7664-9207
Daniel Rudolf ZwahlenInstitute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-7735
Andre BuchaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Hongjian TangInstitute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7812-2575
Christina SchroederInstitute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Paul WindischInstitute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-4888
Erwin VuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (KSSG), 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-517X
Sati AkbabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Tilman BostelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Tanja SpraveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Constantinos ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas ZilliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Geneva (HUG), 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-9883
Jean-Jacques StelmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Cantonal Hospitals (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Tejshri TelkhadeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India.
Vedang MurthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKantonsspital Winterthur · CHUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEPaul Scherrer Institute · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is an established, potentially curative treatment option for all risk constellations of localized prostate cancer (PCA). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and dose-escalated RT can further improve outcome in high-risk (HR) PCA. In recent years, shorter RT schedules based on hypofractionated RT have shown equal outcome. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly conformal RT technique enabling ultra-hypofractionation which has been shown to be safe and efficient in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCA. There is a paucity of data on the role of SBRT in HR PCA. In particular, the need for pelvic elective nodal irradiation (ENI) needs to be addressed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the available data on observed toxicities, ADT prescription practice, and oncological outcome to shed more light on the value of SBRT in HR PCA.

methodsWe searched the PubMed and Embase electronic databases for the terms "prostate cancer" AND "stereotactic" AND "radiotherapy" in June 2020. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.

resultsAfter a rigorous selection process, we identified 18 individual studies meeting all selection criteria for further analyses. Five additional studies were included because their content was judged as relevant. Three trials have reported on prostate SBRT including pelvic nodes; 2 with ENI and 1 with positive pelvic nodes only. The remaining studies investigated SBRT of the prostate only. Grade 2+ acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity was between 12% and 46.7% in the studies investigating pelvic nodes irradiation and ranged from 0% to 89% in the prostate only studies. Grade 2+ chronic GU toxicity was between 7% and 60% vs. 2% and 56.7%. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) grade 2+ toxicity was between 0% to 4% and 0% to 18% for studies with and without pelvic nodes irradiation, respectively. Chronic GI grade 2+ toxicity rates were between 4% and 50.1% vs. 0% and 40%. SBRT of prostate and positive pelvic nodes only showed similar toxicity rates as SBRT for the prostate only. Among the trials that reported on ADT use, the majority of HR PCA patients underwent ADT for at least 2 months; mostly neoadjuvant and concurrent. Biochemical control rates ranged from 82% to 100% after 2 years and 56% to 100% after 3 years. Only a few studies reported longer follow-up data.

conclusionAt this point, SBRT with or without pelvic ENI cannot be considered the standard of care in HR PCA, due to missing level 1 evidence. Treatment may be offered to selected patients at specialized centers with access to high-precision RT. While concomitant ADT is the current standard of care, the necessary duration of ADT in combination with SBRT remains unclear. Ideally, all eligible patients should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapybiochemical controlhigh-risk prostate cancerreviewstereotactic body radiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID33673077
PMCPMC7918664
OpenAlexW3133468505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.