Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672893›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Impact of FAPI-PET/CT on Target Volume Definition in Radiation Therapy of Locally Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer.

Jakob Liermann, Mustafa Syed, Edgar Ben-Josef, Kai Schubert, Ingmar Schlampp, Simon David Sprengel, Jonas Ristau, Fabian Weykamp, Manuel Röhrich, Stefan A Koerber and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Utilization ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Spatiotemporal voxel-wise concordance betweenEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The reproducibility of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET uptake parameters at 15 min and 60 min post-injection.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  13. Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Clinical application of AlCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  15. FAP-targeted PET imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies: a comprehensive review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Review
  16. FAPI PET/CT Imaging-An Updated Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakob LiermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Mustafa SyedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Edgar Ben-JosefDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Kai SchubertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ingmar SchlamppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon David SprengelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonas RistauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian WeykampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel RöhrichDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan A KoerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Juergen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick NaumannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
National Center for Tumor Diseases · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg Physician Scientist Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: A new radioactive positron emission tomography (PET) tracer uses inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAPI) to visualize FAP-expressing cancer associated fibroblasts. Significant FAPI-uptake has recently been demonstrated in pancreatic cancer patients. Target volume delineation for radiation therapy still relies on often less precise conventional computed tomography (CT) imaging, especially in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer patients. The need for improvement in precise tumor detection and delineation led us to innovatively use the novel FAPI-PET/CT for radiation treatment planning. (2) Methods: Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) of seven locally recurrent pancreatic cancer cases were contoured by six radiation oncologists. In addition, FAPI-PET/CT was used to automatically delineate tumors. The interobserver variability in target definition was analyzed and FAPI-based automatic GTVs were compared to the manually defined GTVs. (3) Results: Target definition differed significantly between different radiation oncologists with mean dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) between 0.55 and 0.65. There was no significant difference between the volumes of automatic FAPI-GTVs based on the threshold of 2.0 and most of the manually contoured GTVs by radiation oncologists. (4) Conclusion: Due to its high tumor to background contrast, FAPI-PET/CT seems to be a superior imaging modality compared to the current gold standard contrast-enhanced CT in pancreatic cancer. For the first time, we demonstrate how FAPI-PET/CT could facilitate target definition and increases consistency in radiation oncology in pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

cancer-associated fibroblastsFAPIinterobserver variabilitypancreatic cancertarget definition

Identifiers

PMID33672893
PMCPMC7918160
OpenAlexW3130228378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.