Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672831›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The In Vivo Selection Method in Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Jun Nakayama, Yuxuan Han, Yuka Kuroiwa, Kazushi Azuma, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kentaro Semba

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Leveraging preclinical models of metastatic breast cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun NakayamaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-4295
Yuxuan HanDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.
Yuka KuroiwaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kazushi AzumaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.
Yusuke YamamotoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5262-8479
Kentaro SembaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.
Waseda University · JPFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K16269Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20J01794Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20J23297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis is a complex event in cancer progression and causes most deaths from cancer. Repeated transplantation of metastatic cancer cells derived from transplanted murine organs can be used to select the population of highly metastatic cancer cells; this method is called as in vivo selection. The in vivo selection method and highly metastatic cancer cell lines have contributed to reveal the molecular mechanisms of cancer metastasis. Here, we present an overview of the methodology for the in vivo selection method. Recent comparative analysis of the transplantation methods for metastasis have revealed the divergence of metastasis gene signatures. Even cancer cells that metastasize to the same organ show various metastatic cascades and gene expression patterns by changing the transplantation method for the in vivo selection. These findings suggest that the selection of metastasis models for the study of metastasis gene signatures has the potential to influence research results. The study of novel gene signatures that are identified from novel highly metastatic cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) will be helpful for understanding the novel mechanisms of metastasis.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm MetastasisXenograft Model Antitumor Assaysbreast cancerhighly metastatic cancer cell linein vivo selectionmetastasisxenograft model

Identifiers

PMID33672831
PMCPMC7918415
OpenAlexW3132083016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.