Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672772›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Analysis of Recent Bio-/Nanotechnologies for Coronavirus Diagnosis and Therapy.

Amina Rhouati, Ahlem Teniou, Mihaela Badea, Jean Louis Marty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of biosensors for detection of fibrinogen: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Current state of diagnostic, screening and surveillance testing methods for COVID-19 from an analytical chemistry point of view.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amina RhouatiBioengineering Laboratory, Higher National School of Biotechnology, Constantine 25016, Algeria.
Ahlem TeniouBioengineering Laboratory, Higher National School of Biotechnology, Constantine 25016, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1336-3057
Mihaela BadeaFaculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500039 Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4824-2175
Jean Louis MartyLaboratoire BAE, Université de Perpignan Via domitia, 66860 Perpignan, France.
Higher National Veterinary School · DZTransylvania University of Brașov · ROUniversité de Perpignan · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite barrier measures and physical distancing tailored by the populations worldwide, coronavirus continues to spread causing severe health and social-economic problems. Therefore, researchers are focusing on developing efficient detection and therapeutic platforms for SARS-CoV2. In this context, various biotechnologies, based on novel molecules targeting the virus with high specificity and affinity, have been described. In parallel, new approaches exploring nanotechnology have been proposed for enhancing treatments and diagnosis. We discuss in the first part of this review paper, the different biosensing and rapid tests based on antibodies, nucleic acids and peptide probes described since the beginning of the pandemic. Furthermore, given their numerous advantages, the contribution of nanotechnologies is also highlighted.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesBiotechnologyCOVID-19HumansNanotechnologybiomoleculesbiosensingcoronavirusdiagnosisdrug deliverynanoparticlestreatment

Identifiers

PMID33672772
PMCPMC7924586
OpenAlexW3130351557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.