Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672626›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Natural Biomaterials and Their Use as Bioinks for Printing Tissues.

Claire Benwood, Josie Chrenek, Rebecca L Kirsch, Nadia Z Masri, Hannah Richards, Kyra Teetzen, Stephanie M Willerth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Dextran-based stimuli-responsive hydrogels for smart dressings in wound healing.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claire BenwoodDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Josie ChrenekBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-4918
Rebecca L KirschDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Nadia Z MasriDivision of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Hannah RichardsBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Kyra TeetzenBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Stephanie M WillerthDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1665-7723

Funding

Alzheimer's Association International Research GrantCanada Research Chairs Tier II Chair in Biomedical ResearchMichael Smith Foundation for Health Research/Pacific Parkinson's Research Institute Innovation to Commercialization GrantNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most prevalent form of bioprinting-extrusion bioprinting-can generate structures from a diverse range of materials and viscosities. It can create personalized tissues that aid in drug testing and cancer research when used in combination with natural bioinks. This paper reviews natural bioinks and their properties and functions in hard and soft tissue engineering applications. It discusses agarose, alginate, cellulose, chitosan, collagen, decellularized extracellular matrix, dextran, fibrin, gelatin, gellan gum, hyaluronic acid, Matrigel, and silk. Multi-component bioinks are considered as a way to address the shortfalls of individual biomaterials. The mechanical, rheological, and cross-linking properties along with the cytocompatibility, cell viability, and printability of the bioinks are detailed as well. Future avenues for research into natural bioinks are then presented.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkbiomaterialsregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33672626
PMCPMC7924193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.