ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Assessment of Glyphosate Impact on the Agrofood Ecosystem.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commercial planting of genetically modified maize lowers pest damage, yield loss and pesticide usage in Northeast China.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Can the molecular and transgenic breeding of crops be an alternative and sustainable technology to meet food demand?Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Characterization of Glyphosate Resistance and Degradation Profile ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Proteomic analysis reveals the roles of silicon in mitigating glyphosate-induced toxicity in Brassica napus L.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Associations between urinary glyphosate and arthritis: an US NHANES analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- AMPK-ULK1-Mediated Ferritinophagy Drives Ferroptosis in GLA-Induced Testicular Toxicity.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Oilseed Rape, Wheat, and Barley Grain Contamination as Affected by Different Glyphosate Usage.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agro-industries should adopt effective strategies to use agrochemicals such as glyphosate herbicides cautiously in order to protect public health. This entails careful testing and risk assessment of available choices, and also educating farmers and users with mitigation strategies in ecosystem protection and sustainable development. The key to success in this endeavour is using scientific research on biological pest control, organic farming and regulatory control, etc., for new developments in food production and safety, and for environmental protection. Education and research is of paramount importance for food and nutrition security in the shadow of climate change, and their consequences in food production and consumption safety and sustainability. This review, therefore, diagnoses on the use of glyphosate and the associated development of glyphosate-resistant weeds. It also deals with the risk assessment on human health of glyphosate formulations through environment and dietary exposures based on the impact of glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA-(aminomethyl)phosphonic acid-on water and food. All this to setup further conclusions and recommendations on the regulated use of glyphosate and how to mitigate the adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.