Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672362›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Removal of Parasite Transmission Stages from Berries Using Washing Procedures Suitable for Consumers.

Tamirat T Temesgen, Lucy J Robertson, Vetle M Stigum, Kristoffer R Tysnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamirat T TemesgenLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Adamstuen Campus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 369 Sentrum, 0102 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6946-5055
Lucy J RobertsonLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Adamstuen Campus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 369 Sentrum, 0102 Oslo, Norway.
Vetle M StigumLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Adamstuen Campus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 369 Sentrum, 0102 Oslo, Norway.
Kristoffer R TysnesLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Adamstuen Campus, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 369 Sentrum, 0102 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 267430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the delicate nature of berries and the reduced shelf-life once washed, producers usually do not wash berries. Therefore, consumers are expected to wash the berries prior to consumption, and this might be a more effective way of infection prevention. However, the efficacy of consumer berry-washing procedures in removing the parasite contaminants from the berries surface has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to compare the efficacy of three different washing techniques in removing parasite contaminants. Three alternatives to washing berries before consumption were compared on berries artificially contaminated with oo/cysts of

Indexed as

berriescontaminationCryptosporidiumCyclosporafoodborne parasiteGiardiaremovalwashing

Identifiers

PMID33672362
PMCPMC7926854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.