ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Improvement of Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia: Healthy Tissues Sparing by Reduction in Eddy Currents.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic induction heating: where will the field go next?Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Orchestrating Chemo-Ferroptosis via Nonthermal Magnetocatalysis: A Cascade Amplification Paradigm for Breast Cancer Therapy.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Case Report: Treatment with magnetic nanoparticle-based hyperthermia stabilizes metastatic disease in stage IV primary liver cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Multifunctional Magnetic Nanocomposites: Innovative Processing and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Numerical Simulation of Temperature Variations during the Application of Safety Protocols in Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attenuation of the unwanted heating of normal tissues due to eddy currents presents a major challenge in magnetic particle hyperthermia for cancer treatment. Eddy currents are a direct consequence of the applied alternating magnetic field, which is used to excite the nanoparticles in the tumor and have been shown to limit treatment efficacy in clinical trials. To overcome these challenges, this paper presents simple, clinically applicable, numerical approaches which reduce the temperature increase due to eddy currents in normal tissue and simultaneously retain magnetic nanoparticles heating efficiency within the tumor. More specifically, two protocols are examined which involve moving the heating source, an electromagnetic coil, relative to a tumor-bearing phantom tissue during the exposure. In the first protocol, the linear motion of the coil on one side with respect to the hypothesized tumor location inside the phantom is simulated. The estimated maximum temperature increase in the healthy tissue and tumor is reduced by 12% and 9%, respectively, compared to a non-moving coil, which is the control protocol. The second technique involves a symmetrical variation of the first one, where the coil is moving left and right of the phantom in a bidirectional fashion. This protocol is considered as the optimum one, since the estimated maximum temperature rise of the healthy tissue and tumor is reduced by 25% and 1%, respectively, compared to the control protocol. Thus, the advantages of a linearly moving coil are assessed through tissue sparing, rendering this technique suitable for magnetic particle hyperthermia treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.