ArticleCells2021
Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces.
Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the osteoinductive potential of preconditioned dental pulp stem cell secretome versus their exosomes.Odontology · 2026Article
- From bench to bedside: advances in cell therapy for tuberculosis treatment.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Therapeutic Efficacy and Bioengineering Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biological and Metabolomic Characterization of Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Dental Pulp and Adipose Tissue: a Pilot Comparative Study.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Article
- Neural crest-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Fates and perspectives.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic characterization of transitioning cell types in the skin of Atlantic salmon.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Promotion of hair growth by a conditioned medium from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells cultivated in a 3D scaffold of gelatin sponge.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Bioactive ceramic-based materials: beneficial properties and potential applications in dental repair and regeneration.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Small extracellular vesicles purification and scale-up.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Bioactive Materials That Promote the Homing of Endogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Improve Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Impact of Graphene Derivatives as Artificial Extracellular Matrices on Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Higher Expression of DNA (de)methylation-Related Genes Reduces Adipogenicity in Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current gold-standard strategies for bone regeneration do not achieve the optimal recovery of bone biomechanical properties. To bypass these limitations, tissue engineering techniques based on hybrid materials made up of osteoprogenitor cells-such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-and bioactive ceramic scaffolds-such as calcium phosphate-based (CaPs) bioceramics-seem promising. The biological properties of MSCs are influenced by the tissue source. This study aims to define the optimal MSC source and construct (i.e., the MSC-CaP combination) for clinical application in bone regeneration. A previous iTRAQ analysis generated the hypothesis that anatomical proximity to bone has a direct effect on MSC phenotype. MSCs were isolated from adipose tissue, bone marrow, and dental pulp, then cultured both on a plastic surface and on CaPs (hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate), to compare their biological features. On plastic, MSCs isolated from dental pulp (DPSCs) presented the highest proliferation capacity and the greatest osteogenic potential. On both CaPs, DPSCs demonstrated the greatest capacity to colonise the bioceramics. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a trend that DPSCs had the most robust increase in ALP activity. Regarding CaPs, β-tricalcium phosphate obtained the best viability results, while hydroxyapatite had the highest ALP activity values. Therefore, we propose DPSCs as suitable MSCs for cell-based bone regeneration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.