Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672179›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Perspectives of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists on Adoption of Telehealth for Nutrition Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cory Brunton, Mary Beth Arensberg, Susan Drawert, Christina Badaracco, Wendy Everett, Sharon M McCauley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Supporting those experiencing food insecurity: A scoping review of the role of a dietitian.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How have temporary Medicare telehealth item numbers impacted the use of dietetics services in primary care settings?Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cory BruntonAbbott Nutrition Division of Abbott, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3799-3742
Mary Beth ArensbergAbbott Nutrition Division of Abbott, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9825-2251
Susan DrawertAbbott Nutrition Division of Abbott, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.
Christina BadaraccoAvalere Health, Washington, DC 20005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-0134
Wendy EverettAvalere Health, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Sharon M McCauleyAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.
Abbott (United States) · USPrevea Health · USAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has resulted in a global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that is straining medical resources worldwide. In the United States (US), hospitals and clinics are challenged to accommodate surging patient populations and care needs while preventing further infection spread. Under such conditions, meeting with patients via telehealth technology is a practical way to help maintain meaningful contact while mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The application of telehealth to nutrition care can, in turn, contribute to better outcomes and lower burdens on healthcare resources. To identify trends in telehealth nutrition care before and during the pandemic, we emailed a 20-question, qualitative, structured survey to approximately 200 registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) from hospitals and clinics that have participated in the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii). RDN respondents reported increased use of telehealth-based care for nutritionally at-risk patients during the pandemic. They suggested that use of such telehealth nutrition programs supported positive patient outcomes, and some of their sites planned to continue the telehealth-based nutrition visits in post-pandemic care. Nutrition care by telehealth technology has the potential to improve care provided by practicing RDNs, such as by reducing no-show rates and increasing retention as well as improving health outcomes for patients. Therefore, we call on healthcare professionals and legislative leaders to implement policy and funding changes that will support improved access to nutrition care via telehealth.

Indexed as

challenges and solutions using telehealth for nutrition careCOVID-19malnutritionMalnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii)registered dietitian nutritionistsSARS-CoV-2telehealthtelemedicinetelenutrition

Identifiers

PMID33672179
PMCPMC7926532
OpenAlexW3132677674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.