Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672068›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Predict Fire Performance of Construction Materials and Their Flame Retardancy.

Hoang T Nguyen, Kate T Q Nguyen, Tu C Le, Guomin Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hoang T NguyenDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-6156
Kate T Q NguyenDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-4127
Tu C LeManufacturing, Materials and Mechatronics, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3552-8211
Guomin ZhangDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-7431

Funding

Australian Research Council DE190100217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation and interpretation of the behavior of construction materials under fire conditions have been complicated. Over the last few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a reliable method to tackle this engineering problem. This review summarizes existing studies that applied AI to predict the fire performance of different construction materials (e.g., concrete, steel, timber, and composites). The prediction of the flame retardancy of some structural components such as beams, columns, slabs, and connections by utilizing AI-based models is also discussed. The end of this review offers insights on the advantages, existing challenges, and recommendations for the development of AI techniques used to evaluate the fire performance of construction materials and their flame retardancy. This review offers a comprehensive overview to researchers in the fields of fire engineering and material science, and it encourages them to explore and consider the use of AI in future research projects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceConstruction MaterialsFiresFlame RetardantsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerFlame Retardantsartificial intelligencechemical kineticscombustionflame retardantsmachine learningpyrolysis

Identifiers

PMID33672068
PMCPMC7919694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.