Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33672008›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Blood Biomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia: Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sofia Ntymenou, Ioanna Tsantzali, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Konstantinos I Voumvourakis, Elisabeth Kapaki, Georgios Tsivgoulis, George Stranjalis, George P Paraskevas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Blood-Based Biomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Early Alzheimer's Disease Screening Approach Using Plasma Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Frontotemporal Dementia, Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia NtymenouDepartment of Neurology, Evangelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Ioanna Tsantzali2nd Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, "Attikon" University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-7059
Theodosis KalamatianosDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos I Voumvourakis2nd Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, "Attikon" University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Elisabeth KapakiWard of Cognitive and Movement Disorders, 1st Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Eginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Georgios Tsivgoulis2nd Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, "Attikon" University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
George StranjalisDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece.
George P Paraskevas2nd Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, "Attikon" University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GREvangelismos Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are useful in the differential diagnosis between frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's dementia (AD), but require lumbar puncture, which is a moderately invasive procedure that can cause anxiety to patients. Gradually, the measurement of blood biomarkers has been attracting great interest. Testing blood instead of CSF, in order to measure biomarkers, offers numerous advantages because it negates the need for lumbar puncture, it is widely available, and can be repeated, allowing the prediction of disease course. In this study, a systematic review of the existing literature was conducted, as well as meta-analysis with greater emphasis on the most studied biomarkers, p-tau and progranulin. The goal was to give prominence to evidence regarding the use of plasma biomarkers in clinical practice.

Indexed as

blood biomarkersfrontotemporal dementiaprogranulin

Identifiers

PMID33672008
PMCPMC7919273
OpenAlexW3132159514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.