ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a diabetes-specific formula in non-diabetic inpatients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Nutrition & diabetes · 2024Trial
- Dysphagia Management in Geriatric Medicine: Clinical Perspectives and Practice Patterns.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Assessment of Dysphagia Management Competence among Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Electroencephalographic Characterization of Sensorimotor Neural Activation During Swallowing in Dysphagic Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Age-defying swallowing.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
- Implications of health professionals' awareness and involvement in oropharyngeal dysphagia management on inpatient outcomes in a National Hospital in Kenya: a case study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Tackling unmanaged oropharyngeal dysphagia in primary care: a behavioural science realist review of interventions.BMJ open · 2024Review
- Predictors of medical staff's knowledge, attitudes and behavior of dysphagia assessment: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of the Community General Practice Teams on Dysphagia Complicated with Aspiration Pneumonia after Stroke.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Expert-level aspiration and penetration detection during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- The Contribution of Temporal Flat Lateral Position on the Mortality and Discharge Rates of Older Patients with Severe Dysphagia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nurses on dysphagia screening and oral care in acute stroke patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine healthcare providers' knowledge and practices about dysphagia. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out based on a self-administered and anonymous questionnaire addressed to healthcare providers in Spain. A total of 396 healthcare providers participated in the study. Of these, 62.3% knew the definition of dysphagia as a swallowing disorder. In addition, up to 39.2% of the participants reported that they did not know whether the EatingAssessmentTool (EAT-10) dysphagia screening test was usedin their own clinical settings. Similarly, up to 49.1% of them did not know the ClinicalExaminationVolume-Viscosity (MECV-V) method. Nearly all participants (98.8%) reported that thickeners must be used forall liquids administered to patients. A higher percentage of respondents based the choice of texture on patient's tolerance (78.2%) rather than on the MECV-V result (17.3%). In addition,76.4% of the professionals had witnessed a bronchoaspiration; after it, 44.4% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.