Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33671698›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Bio-Inspired and Smart Nanoparticles for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Microenvironment.

Mahsa Keihan Shokooh, Fakhrossadat Emami, Jee-Heon Jeong, Simmyung Yook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Network Pharmacology andCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Synthesis of Novel Acyl Derivatives of 3-(4,5,6,7-Tetrabromo-1International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahsa Keihan ShokoohDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.
Fakhrossadat EmamiCollege of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Jee-Heon JeongCollege of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7120-169X
Simmyung YookCollege of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea.

Funding

Bisa Research Grant of Keimyung University 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with poor prognosis and aggressive nature accounts for 10-20% of all invasive breast cancer (BC) cases and is detected in as much as 15% of individuals diagnosed with BC. Currently, due to the absence of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor, there is no hormone-based therapy for TNBC. In addition, there are still no FDA-approved targeted therapies for patients with TNBC. TNBC treatment is challenging owing to poor prognosis, tumor heterogeneity, chemotherapeutic side effects, the chance of metastasis, and multiple drug-resistance. Therefore, various bio-inspired tumor-homing nano systems responding to intra- and extra- cellular stimuli are an urgent need to treat TNBC patients who do not respond to current chemotherapy. In this review, intensive efforts have been made for exploring cell-membrane coated nanoparticles and immune cell-targeted nanoparticles (immunotherapy) to modulate the tumor microenvironment and deliver accurate amounts of therapeutic agents to TNBC without stimulating the immune system.

Indexed as

cell membrane coated nanoparticlesimmune cell targeted nanoparticlessmart nanoparticlestargeted therapytriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33671698
PMCPMC7926463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.