Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33671641›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Plasticity in Colorectal Cancer: Why Cancer Cells Differentiate.

Romina Judith Walter, Steffen Joachim Sonnentag, Véronique Orian-Rousseau, Leonel Munoz-Sagredo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Romina Judith WalterKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems-Functional Molecular Systems, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Steffen Joachim SonnentagKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems-Functional Molecular Systems, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Véronique Orian-RousseauKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems-Functional Molecular Systems, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Leonel Munoz-SagredoKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems-Functional Molecular Systems, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEViña del Mar University · CL

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft OR124/12-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft OR124/15-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell hypothesis poses that the bulk of differentiated cells are non-tumorigenic and only a subset of cells with self-renewal capabilities drive tumor initiation and progression. This means that differentiation could have a tumor-suppressive effect. Accumulating evidence shows, however, that in some solid tumors, like colorectal cancer, such a hierarchical organization is necessary. The identification of Lgr5 as a reliable marker of normal intestinal epithelial stem cells, together with strategies to trace cell lineages within tumors and the possibility to selectively ablate these cells, have proven the relevance of Lgr5

Indexed as

cancer stem cell markerscancer stem cellsclonal cooperationcolorectal cancerlineage tracingplasticityradio-resistanceserial transplantationtherapeutic resistancetumor heterogeneitytumor-organoids

Identifiers

PMID33671641
PMCPMC7926445
OpenAlexW3132408484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.