ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Optimal Service Provisioning for the Scalable Fog/Edge Computing Environment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Industry 4.0: A Proposal of Paradigm Organization Schemes from a Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Availability of an RFID Object-Identification System in IoT Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Edge/Fog Computing Technologies for IoT Infrastructure.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, we observed the proliferation of cloud data centers (CDCs) and the Internet of Things (IoT). Cloud computing based on CDCs has the drawback of unpredictable response times due to variant delays between service requestors (IoT devices and end devices) and CDCs. This deficiency of cloud computing is especially problematic in providing IoT services with strict timing requirements and as a result, gives birth to fog/edge computing (FEC) whose responsiveness is achieved by placing service images near service requestors. In FEC, the computing nodes located close to service requestors are called fog/edge nodes (FENs). In addition, for an FEN to execute a specific service, it has to be provisioned with the corresponding service image. Most of the previous work on the service provisioning in the FEC environment deals with determining an appropriate FEN satisfying the requirements like delay, CPU and storage from the perspective of one or more service requests. In this paper, we determined how to optimally place service images in consideration of the pre-obtained service demands which may be collected during the prior time interval. The proposed FEC environment is scalable in the sense that the resources of FENs are effectively utilized thanks to the optimal provisioning of services on FENs. We propose two approaches to provision service images on FENs. In order to validate the performance of the proposed mechanisms, intensive simulations were carried out for various service demand scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.