ArticlePolymers2021
Investigation of the Ballistic Performance of GFRP Laminate under 150 m/s High-Velocity Impact: Simulation and Experiment.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on High-Velocity Impact Perforation Performance of CFRP Laminates for Rail Vehicles: Experiment and Simulation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Modeling and Experimental Analysis of the Ballistic Performance of Steel-Based FML Targets.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ballistic performance of Polycarbonate and Polymethyl methacrylate under normal and inclined dynamic impacts.Heliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ballistic resistance of GFRP laminates subjected to high-velocity impact was studied. Based on the damage situation of GFRP laminate observed from the single-stage gas gun testing, the three-dimensional (3D) model combining strain rate effect and Hashin failure criterion was established, and the result presented good agreement between the simulation and experiment. Three factors, including layer angle, stacking sequence and proportion of different layer angles, were taken into consideration in the models. An orthogonal test method was used for the analysis, which can reduce the number of simulations effectively without sacrificing the accuracy of the result. The result indicated a correlation between the ballistic resistance and layouts of GFRP laminates, on which the stacking sequence contributed stronger influence. What was more, the laminate with layer angles 0°/90° and ±45° presented greater ballistic resistance than the other angle pairs, and adopting an equal proportion of different layer angles is helpful for GFRP laminates to resist impact as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.