Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33671371›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Self-Reported Assessment of Empathy and Its Variations in a Sample of Greek Social Workers.

Maria Moudatsou, Areti Stavropoulou, Athanasios Alegakis, Anastas Philalithis, Sofia Koukouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria MoudatsouDepartment of Social Work, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece.
Areti StavropoulouDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, 122 43 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8616-3884
Athanasios AlegakisDepartment of Toxicology, University of Crete, 700 13 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6507-8691
Anastas PhilalithisDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Crete, 700 13 Heraklion, Greece.
Sofia KoukouliDepartment of Social Work, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was twofold: (a) to examine the way in which professional social workers perceive and apply in their practice the concept of empathy; (b) to explore sociodemographic factors, education/special training and work characteristics associated with their empathic skills. This is a cross-sectional study with a purposive sample of 203 Greek social workers. For the assessment of empathy, the Empathy Scale for Social Workers (ESSW) was used. The sample consisted mainly of female social workers with a mean age of 43.8 years. More than 70% of them were practicing the profession for more than 10 years. Nearly one-third participated in psychotherapy courses, and only half of them have been certified. On average, they reported high levels of empathy. Initial univariate analyses showed that empathy scores were significantly higher for older social workers, married, the more experienced, those who referred to working experience with disabled people or people having problems with substance use and the professionals who had obtained a certification in psychotherapy. 'Having a middle work experience of 10-19 years' was a significant correlate in all scales and related negatively to empathy indicating a burnout effect. The implications for social work education and future training are discussed.

Indexed as

empathyempathy scale for social workers (ESSW)Greecehealthcare professionalssocial workers

Identifiers

PMID33671371
PMCPMC7922947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.