Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33671265›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

In-Vivo Degradation Behavior and Osseointegration of 3D Powder-Printed Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds.

Katharina Kowalewicz, Elke Vorndran, Franziska Feichtner, Anja-Christina Waselau, Manuel Brueckner, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 3D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Technologies and Resources Utilized.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resorbable MgMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Advances in 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina KowalewiczClinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Elke VorndranDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Franziska FeichtnerClinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Anja-Christina WaselauClinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Manuel BruecknerDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Andrea Meyer-LindenbergClinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 417069397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium magnesium phosphate cements (CMPCs) are promising bone substitutes and experience great interest in research. Therefore, in-vivo degradation behavior, osseointegration and biocompatibility of three-dimensional (3D) powder-printed CMPC scaffolds were investigated in the present study. The materials Mg225 (Ca

Indexed as

3D powder printingbiocompatibilitydegradable bone substitutesfarringtonitein-vivo Micro-Computed Tomographyosseointegrationscaffoldstanfieldite

Identifiers

PMID33671265
PMCPMC7923127
OpenAlexW3131955761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.