ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of natural scaffolds as HER2 inhibitors for breast cancer: virtual screening, molecular dynamics, and biological characterization with selectivity profiling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of Microbial-Based Natural Products as Potential CYP51 Inhibitors for Eumycetoma Treatment: Insights from Molecular Docking, MM-GBSA Calculations, ADMET Analysis, and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Examining Prenylated Xanthones as Potential Inhibitors Against Ketohexokinase C Isoform for the Treatment of Fructose-Driven Metabolic Disorders: An Integrated Computational Approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Statistical Methods in the Study of Protein Binding and Its Relationship to Drug Bioavailability in Breast Milk.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study of the Lipophilicity of Metformin and Phenformin.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma protein binding is an important determinant of the pharmacokinetic properties of chemical compounds in living organisms. The aim of the present study was to determine the index of protein binding affinity based on chromatographic experiments. The question is which chromatographic environment will best mimic the drug-protein binding conditions. Retention data from normal phase thin-layer liquid chromatography (NP TLC), reversed phase (RP) TLC and HPLC chromatography experiments with 129 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were collected. The stationary phase of the TLC plates was modified with protein and the HPLC column was filled with immobilized human serum albumin. In both chromatographic methods, the mobile phase was based on a buffer with a pH of 7.4 to mimic physiological conditions. Chemometric analyses were performed to compare multiple linear regression models (MLRs) with retention data, using protein binding values as the dependent variable. In the course of the analysis, APIs were divided into acidic, basic and neutral groups, and separate models were created for each group. The MLR models had a coefficient of determination between 0.73 and 0.91, with the highest values from NP TLC data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.