Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33671018›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Incidence and Risk Factors of Hyperuricemia among 2.5 Million Chinese Adults during the Years 2017-2018.

Ruiqi Shan, Yi Ning, Yuan Ma, Xiang Gao, Zechen Zhou, Cheng Jin, Jing Wu, Jun Lv, Liming Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Molecular Mechanism of Polysaccharides fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruiqi ShanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Yi NingMeinian Public Health Institute, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Yuan MaMeinian Institute of Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Zechen ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Cheng JinMeinian Institute of Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Jing WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Jun LvDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-3870
Liming LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University · CNPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

HyperuricemiaAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUric AcidUric Acidepidemiologyhyperuricemiaincidence

Identifiers

PMID33671018
PMCPMC7957707
OpenAlexW3133936092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.