Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670991›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Influence of Polymeric Restorative Materials on the Stress Distribution in Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures: 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Larissa Mendes Campaner, Marcos Paulo Motta Silveira, Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Marco Antonio Bottino, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Roberto Lo Giudice, Pietro Ausiello, João Paulo Mendes Tribst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa Mendes CampanerInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.
Marcos Paulo Motta SilveiraInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.
Guilherme Schmitt de AndradeInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5697-2947
Alexandre Luiz Souto BorgesInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-7565
Marco Antonio BottinoInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal PivaInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3844-2053
Roberto Lo GiudiceDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Messina University, AOU Policlinico "G.Martino", Via Consolare Valeria, 98100 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-709X
Pietro AusielloSchool of Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
João Paulo Mendes TribstInstitute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12220690, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5412-3546
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the effect of interim restorative materials (acrylic resin (AR), resin composite (RC) or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for dental computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)) on the stress distribution of a posterior three-unit fixed partial denture.

methodsThe abutment teeth (first molar and first premolar) were modeled using the BioCAD protocol containing 1.5 mm of axial reduction and converging axial walls. A static structural analysis was performed in the computer-aided engineering software, and the Maximum Principal Stress criterion was used to analyze the prosthesis and the cement layers of both abutment teeth. The materials were considered isotropic, linearly elastic, homogeneous and with bonded contacts. An axial load (600 N) was applied to the occlusal surface of the second premolar.

resultsRegardless of the restorative material, the region of the prosthetic connectors showed the highest tensile stress magnitude. The highest stress peak was observed with the use of RC (129 MPa) compared to PEEK and AR. For the cement layers, RC showed the lowest values in the occlusal region (7 MPa) and the highest values for the cervical margin (14 MPa) compared to PEEK (21 and 12 MPa) and AR (21 and 13 MPa).

conclusionsDifferent interim restorative materials for posterior fixed partial dentures present different biomechanical behavior. The use of resin composite can attenuate the stress magnitude on the cement layer, and the use of acrylic resin can attenuate the stress magnitude on the connector region.

Indexed as

biomechanicsdental materialsfinite element analysisprosthodontics

Identifiers

PMID33670991
PMCPMC7957672
OpenAlexW3135257782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.