Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670971›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Access to Vaccination Information and Confidence/Hesitancy Towards Childhood Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Fanxing Du, Tracey Chantler, Mark R Francis, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Xuan Zhang, Kaiyi Han, Lance Rodewald, Hongjie Yu, Shiyi Tu, Heidi Larson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fanxing DuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Tracey ChantlerDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7776-7339
Mark R FrancisDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-4298
Fiona Yueqian SunDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Xuan ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China.
Kaiyi HanSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lance RodewaldChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-542X
Hongjie YuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shiyi TuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Heidi LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-7583
Zhiyuan HouSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-0076
Fudan University · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research EPIDZL9012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to vaccination information could influence public attitudes towards vaccination. This study investigated the number and types of vaccination-related information sources, and estimated their associations with vaccine confidence and hesitancy in China. In January 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in China, and 2122 caregivers with children <6 years completed self-administered questionnaires. Logistic regressions were used to assess associations between caregivers' primary information sources and vaccine confidence/hesitancy. A majority (72%) of caregivers had multiple sources of vaccination-related information. The proportions of caregivers reporting professional sources, media, and peers as primary information sources were 81%, 63%, and 26%. Internal migrants were less likely to get information from professional sources; more educated and wealthier caregivers reported more information sources and were more likely to get information from media and peers. Caregivers who reported professional information sources had significantly higher odds of being confident about the safety of vaccines and lower odds of being hesitant toward vaccination than those who did not. Caregivers who reported the media as a primary information source had significantly higher odds of being hesitant toward vaccination than those who did not. To address vaccine hesitancy, it is essential to promote universal access to professional vaccination-related information sources, and to use the media to disseminate evidence-based information and clarify misinformation. Health communication should target internal migrants, and more educated and wealthier caregivers.

Indexed as

Chinaconfidencehesitancyvaccination informationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID33670971
PMCPMC7997233
OpenAlexW3133776669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.