Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670859›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Capsid and Genome Modification Strategies to Reduce the Immunogenicity of Adenoviral Vectors.

Florian Kreppel, Claudia Hagedorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. MicroRNAs in T Cell-Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian KreppelCenter for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H), Stockumer Str. 10, 58448 Witten, Germany.
Claudia HagedornCenter for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H), Stockumer Str. 10, 58448 Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7010-4807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenovirus-based gene transfer vectors are the most frequently used vector type in gene therapy clinical trials to date, and they play an important role as genetic vaccine candidates during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Immediately upon delivery, adenovirus-based vectors exhibit multiple complex vector-host interactions and induce innate and adaptive immune responses. This can severely limit their safety and efficacy, particularly after delivery through the blood stream. In this review article we summarize two strategies to modulate Ad vector-induced immune responses: extensive genomic and chemical capsid modifications. Both strategies have shown beneficial effects in a number of preclinical studies while potential synergistic effects warrant further investigations.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsCapsidCapsid ProteinsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGenetic VectorsHumansImmunityImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2Capsid ProteinsCOVID-19 VaccinesadenoviruscloakingHPMAimmune responsePEGylationshieldingstealthingvector

Identifiers

PMID33670859
PMCPMC7957472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.