Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670680›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Cellular Fitness Phenotypes of Cancer Target Genes from Oncobiology to Cancer Therapeutics.

Bijesh George, P Mukundan Pillai, Aswathy Mary Paul, Revikumar Amjesh, Kim Leitzel, Suhail M Ali, Oleta Sandiford, Allan Lipton, Pranela Rameshwar, Gabriel N Hortobagyi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bijesh GeorgeCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
P Mukundan PillaiCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
Aswathy Mary PaulCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
Revikumar AmjeshCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
Kim LeitzelHematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State University School of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Suhail M AliLebanon Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lebanon, PA 17042, USA.
Oleta SandifordDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Allan LiptonHematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State University School of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Pranela RameshwarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-9034
Gabriel N HortobagyiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-4412
Madhavan Radhakrishna PillaiCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
Rakesh KumarCancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695014, India.
Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology · INLebanon VA Medical Center · USManipal Academy of Higher Education · INPennsylvania State University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To define the growing significance of cellular targets and/or effectors of cancer drugs, we examined the fitness dependency of cellular targets and effectors of cancer drug targets across human cancer cells from 19 cancer types. We observed that the deletion of 35 out of 47 cellular effectors and/or targets of oncology drugs did not result in the expected loss of cell fitness in appropriate cancer types for which drugs targeting or utilizing these molecules for their actions were approved. Additionally, our analysis recognized 43 cellular molecules as fitness genes in several cancer types in which these drugs were not approved, and thus, providing clues for repurposing certain approved oncology drugs in such cancer types. For example, we found a widespread upregulation and fitness dependency of several components of the mevalonate and purine biosynthesis pathways (currently targeted by bisphosphonates, statins, and pemetrexed in certain cancers) and an association between the overexpression of these molecules and reduction in the overall survival duration of patients with breast and other hard-to-treat cancers, for which such drugs are not approved. In brief, the present analysis raised cautions about off-target and undesirable effects of certain oncology drugs in a subset of cancers where the intended cellular effectors of drug might not be good fitness genes and that this study offers a potential rationale for repurposing certain approved oncology drugs for targeted therapeutics in additional cancer types.

Indexed as

HumansMedical OncologyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsOncogenesPhenotypeSurvival Analysisbreast cancer hard-to-treat cancerscancer fitness genesMevalonate and Purine biosynthesisoncology drugsrepurposing

Identifiers

PMID33670680
PMCPMC7921985
OpenAlexW3131290020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.