Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670621›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Spain's Hesitation at the Gates of a COVID-19 Vaccine.

Hans Eguia, Franco Vinciarelli, Marina Bosque-Prous, Troels Kristensen, Francesc Saigí-Rubió

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions amongst Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hans EguiaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona 08018, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-8559
Franco VinciarelliSEMERGEN New Technologies Working Group, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Marina Bosque-ProusFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona 08018, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8830-8880
Troels KristensenDanish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern (DaCHE), 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-6895
Francesc Saigí-RubióFaculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona 08018, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aims to delineate a pattern on vaccine hesitancy in a sample of the Spanish population, considering age groups and status as healthcare workers. (2) Methods: Participants were recruited using Twitter

Indexed as

COVID-19perceptionsocio-cultural factorsvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33670621
PMCPMC7922768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.