Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670524›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Therapeutic Advances in Oncology.

Jinsha Liu, Priyanka Pandya, Sepideh Afshar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Research Progress on the Anticancer Effect of Ginsenoside Rh1.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. o8G-modified circKIAA1797 promotes lung cancer development by inhibiting cuproptosis.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nanotechnology Applications in Breast Cancer Immunotherapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinsha LiuProtein Engineering, Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Priyanka PandyaProtein Engineering, Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Sepideh AfsharProtein Engineering, Lilly Biotechnology Center, Eli Lilly and Company, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 77 new oncology drugs were approved by the FDA in the past five years; however, most cancers remain untreated. Small molecules and antibodies are dominant therapeutic modalities in oncology. Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, peptides, cell, and gene-therapies are emerging to address the unmet patient need. Advancement in the discovery and development platforms, identification of novel targets, and emergence of new technologies have greatly expanded the treatment options for patients. Here, we provide an overview of various therapeutic modalities and the current treatment options in oncology, and an in-depth discussion of the therapeutics in the preclinical stage for the treatment of breast cancer, lung cancer, and multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGenetic TherapyHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyMedical OncologyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsSmall Molecule LibrariesAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoconjugatesSmall Molecule Librariesbreast cancerinnovationlung cancermultiple myelomaoncologytherapeutic modalities

Identifiers

PMID33670524
PMCPMC7922397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.