ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021
What Do Lithuanian Hunters Think of African Swine Fever and Its Control-Perceptions.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Hunting Strategies for African Swine Fever Control in Wild Boar: A Comparative Review of Experiences in European Continent.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Disease outbreak in wildlife changes online sales of management items.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Exploratory Report of Wild Boar Surveillance and Epidemiological Course of African Swine Fever Outbreak; Case in the Republic of Korea From 2019 to 2023.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Identifying stakeholders and analyzing their concerns about African swine fever control in wild boar.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The many boar identities: understanding difference and change in the geographies of European wild boar management.Journal of environmental planning and management · 2025Article
- From Catastrophe to Hope: Hunters' Experiences in the Eradication of Sweden's First African Swine Fever Outbreak.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Perceptions and practices of Swedish wild boar hunters in relation to African swine fever before the first outbreak in Sweden.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Motivation and Habits of a Wild Boar-Hunting Community.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- African Swine Fever in Wild Boar: German Hunters' Perception of Surveillance and Control-A Questionnaire Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The perceptions of Lithuanian hunters towards African swine fever using a participatory approach.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Eight Years of African Swine Fever in the Baltic States: Epidemiological Reflections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- African Swine Fever Survey in a European Context.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prospects for the application of infectious virus detection technology based on propidium monoazide in African swine fever management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Europe-A Review.Viruses · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After the introduction of African swine fever (ASF) into Lithuania in 2014, continuous spread of the disease resulted in infection of the wild boar populations in most parts of Lithuania. The virus has been moving closer to other Western European countries where pig density is high. An efficient surveillance system detecting ASF cases early in domestic and wild animals is necessary to manage this disease. To make surveillance appropriate and effective, it is critical to understand how key players perceive the implemented control measures. This study investigated the attitudes and beliefs of hunters in Lithuania regarding currently implemented or proposed measures for the control of ASF in the wild boar population. Study data were collected through questionnaires distributed via the internet and by hunting associations in Lithuania. In total, 621 fully completed questionnaires were received and analyzed. All measures interfering with extensive hunting, like ban of driven or individual hunting or ban of supplementary feeding were considered as unacceptable and as ineffective measures to control ASF in wild boar. However, selective hunting of female wild boar was generally considered as an unethical act and therefore rejected. Some measures that seem to have been successful in other countries, like involvement of additional forces, were rejected by Lithuanian hunters, thus implementation of these measures could be difficult. The study highlighted that there is a need for improving important relationships with other stakeholders, since many hunters expressed a lack of trust in governmental institutions and regarded cooperation with them as insufficient. Hunters emphasized that their motivation to support passive surveillance measures could be improved with financial compensation and reduction of workload. The present study provides insights into hunters' perceptions, which may be used as a foundation for additional discussions with these important stakeholders and for adapting measures to improve their acceptance if appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.