Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670277›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Virtual Reality for Neurorehabilitation and Cognitive Enhancement.

Danko D Georgiev, Iva Georgieva, Zhengya Gong, Vijayakumar Nanjappan, Georgi V Georgiev

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07659288 (Differential Motor and Cognitive Responses to Two Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation Approaches in Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07659288 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Differential Motor and Cognitive Responses to Two Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation Approaches in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuro Group XR Inc.Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled16ConditionsParkinson s DiseaseArmsImmersive Virtual Reality, Non-Immersive Virtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Danko D GeorgievInstitute for Advanced Study, 9010 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-6846-1194
Iva GeorgievaInstitute for Advanced Study, 9010 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-8690
Zhengya GongCenter for Ubiquitous Computing, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0560-6530
Vijayakumar NanjappanCenter for Ubiquitous Computing, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6081-2826
Georgi V GeorgievCenter for Ubiquitous Computing, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3127-9820
University of Oulu · FICentre for Advanced Study · BG

Funding

Academy of Finland 318927EDUFI Fellowship TM-20-11342Horizon 2020 856998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our access to computer-generated worlds changes the way we feel, how we think, and how we solve problems. In this review, we explore the utility of different types of virtual reality, immersive or non-immersive, for providing controllable, safe environments that enable individual training, neurorehabilitation, or even replacement of lost functions. The neurobiological effects of virtual reality on neuronal plasticity have been shown to result in increased cortical gray matter volumes, higher concentration of electroencephalographic beta-waves, and enhanced cognitive performance. Clinical application of virtual reality is aided by innovative brain-computer interfaces, which allow direct tapping into the electric activity generated by different brain cortical areas for precise voluntary control of connected robotic devices. Virtual reality is also valuable to healthy individuals as a narrative medium for redesigning their individual stories in an integrative process of self-improvement and personal development. Future upgrades of virtual reality-based technologies promise to help humans transcend the limitations of their biological bodies and augment their capacity to mold physical reality to better meet the needs of a globalized world.

Indexed as

brain cortexcognitionmotor controlneurorehabilitationperceptionrobotic devicesself-enhancementvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33670277
PMCPMC7918687
OpenAlexW3127329164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.