ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Elderly Perception on the Internet of Things-Based Integrated Smart-Home System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart Home Technologies for Ageing in Place: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes, Independence, Healthcare Utilisation and Implementation Considerations.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Benefits and barriers associated with the use of smart home health technologies in the care of older persons: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- A system for monitoring the functional status of older adults in daily life.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Examining Canadian Smart Home Technology Users' Perceptions of Privacy, Risks, Safety, and Data Collection Purposes: Cross-Sectional National Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- NeuroSift for Task-Aware Quality Assurance of Multimedia Data in Remote Parkinson Disease Assessment: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Emerging Technologies and Vulnerabilities in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairments: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Promoting healthy aging in a digital world: leveraging technology for enhanced elderly care and wellbeing.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- What constitutes good care in the context of depopulating rural Korea? Perspectives of village care managers amid digital transitions.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Development of a Hospital-at-Home Digital Twin for Patients With Frailty: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A Study on the Acceptance of Smart Cane Technology Among Chinese Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fueling the development of elderly care services in China with digital technology: A provincial panel data analysis.Heliyon · 2025Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Dental Clinic Transmission: Leveraging Internet of Things Technology.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Advances in applying somatosensory interaction technology in geriatric care: A bibliometric analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024Review
- Developing Independent Living Support for Older Adults Using Internet of Things and AI-Based Systems: Co-Design Study.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- User Perception of Smart Home Surveillance Among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Factors affecting the elderly's behavioral intention toward smart home systems: A cross-sectional study from China's eastern coast.PloS one · 2024Article
- Remote Technologies and Filial Obligations at a Distance: New Opportunities and Ethical Challenges.Asian bioethics review · 2023Article
- Unleashing the Power of IoT: A Comprehensive Review of IoT Applications and Future Prospects in Healthcare, Agriculture, Smart Homes, Smart Cities, and Industry 4.0.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of a Smart Home Interface With Older Adults: Multi-Method Co-Design Study.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Survey on the Acceptance of Ambient Sensors in Solo and Older Couple-Only Households in Japan.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An integrated smart home system (ISHS) is an effective way to improve the quality of life of the elderly. The elderly's willingness is essential to adopt an ISHS; to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the elderly's perception of ISHS. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the elderly's perception of the ISHS by comprehensively evaluating its possible benefits and negative responses. A set of sensors required for an ISHS was determined, and interviews were designed based on four factors: perceived comfort, perceived usability, perceived privacy, and perceived benefit. Subsequently, technological trials of the sensor-set followed by two focus group interviews were conducted on nine independently living elderly participants at a senior welfare center in South Korea. Consistent with previous studies, the results of this investigation indicate that elderly participants elicited negative responses regarding usability complexity, and discomfort to daily activities. Despite such negative responses, after acquiring enough awareness about the ISHS's benefits, the elderly acknowledged its necessity and showed a high level of willingness. Furthermore, these results indicate that for a better adoption of an ISHS, sufficient awareness regarding its benefits and development of elderly-friendly smart home sensors that minimize negative responses are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.