Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670222›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Mobile App to Optimize Social Participation for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: Content Validation and Usability Testing.

Dahlia Kairy, Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi, Catherine Blanchette-Dallaire, Eva Belanger, Andrea Corbeil, Meena Kandiah, Tian Qiang Wu, Barbara Mazer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Designing an eHealth Well-Being Program: A Participatory Design Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dahlia KairySchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3N 1X7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6872-6607
Mir Abolfazl MostafaviDépartement des Sciences Géomatiques, Faculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et de Géomatique, Centre de Recherche en Donnée et Intelligence Géospatiales, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-6638
Catherine Blanchette-DallaireOnRoule.org, Montreal, QC H2L 1S5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6279-8300
Eva BelangerSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Andrea CorbeilSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Meena KandiahSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Tian Qiang WuSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-7437
Barbara MazerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC H3S 1M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial participation is beneficial for individuals' health. However, people with disabilities that may lead to mobility limitations tend to experience lower levels of social participation. Information and communication technologies such as the

objectivesTo obtain potential users' perceptions on the usability and content of the MATERIALS AND

methodsCross-sectional user-centered design study. Individuals with physical disabilities (

resultsThree main themes were identified: (1) "user-friendliness"; (2) "balance between the amount and relevance of information"; and (3) "potential use of the app". DISCUSSION AND

conclusionFindings from this study indicated that the app was easy to use, had pertinent information, and enabled a positive experience of finding information. However, several areas of improvement were identified, such as the clarity of specific elements, organization and amount of information, optimization of features, and inclusiveness. Apps such as

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPersons with DisabilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSocial ParticipationUser-Centered DesignUser-Computer InterfaceaccessibilitymHealthmobile applicationphysical disabilitysocial participationusabilityuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID33670222
PMCPMC7916924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.