Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33670203›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Sublethal Exposure Effects of the Neonicotinoid Clothianidin Strongly Modify the Brain Transcriptome and Proteome in the Male Moth

Camille Meslin, Françoise Bozzolan, Virginie Braman, Solenne Chardonnet, Cédric Pionneau, Marie-Christine François, Dany Severac, Christophe Gadenne, Sylvia Anton, Martine Maibèche and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camille MeslinDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.
Françoise BozzolanDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.
Virginie BramanDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.
Solenne ChardonnetPlateforme Post-Génomique de la Pitié-Salpêtrière (P3S), UMS 37 PASS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-0074
Cédric PionneauPlateforme Post-Génomique de la Pitié-Salpêtrière (P3S), UMS 37 PASS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6270-7421
Marie-Christine FrançoisDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.
Dany SeveracMGX, BioCampus Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Christophe GadenneInstitut de Génétique Environnement et Protection des Plantes IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 49045 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-9130
Sylvia AntonInstitut de Génétique Environnement et Protection des Plantes IGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 49045 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-8056
Martine MaibècheDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-0490
Emmanuelle Jacquin-JolyDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-2036
David SiaussatDépartement Ecologie Sensorielle, Institut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Sorbonne Université, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-0370

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche PHEROTOX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect pest management relies mainly on neurotoxic insecticides, including neonicotinoids such as clothianidin. The residual accumulation of low concentrations of these insecticides can have positive effects on target pest insects by enhancing various life traits. Because pest insects often rely on sex pheromones for reproduction and olfactory synaptic transmission is cholinergic, neonicotinoid residues could indeed modify chemical communication. We recently showed that treatments with low doses of clothianidin could induce hormetic effects on behavioral and neuronal sex pheromone responses in the male moth,

Indexed as

Agrotis ipsilonclothianidinhormesispest insectproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33670203
PMCPMC7916958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.