Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669965›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Spatiotemporal Overlap between the European Brown Hare and Its Potential Predators and Competitors.

Andrea Viviano, Emiliano Mori, Niccolò Fattorini, Giuseppe Mazza, Lorenzo Lazzeri, Alessandra Panichi, Luigi Strianese, Walid Fathy Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spatio-Temporal Niche of Sympatric Tufted Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Dynamics ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea VivianoDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Università degli Studi di Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2970-3389
Emiliano MoriConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-7950
Niccolò FattoriniDipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e Politiche-ESP, Università di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8022-7464
Giuseppe MazzaCREA Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification, Cascine del Riccio, 50125 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6644-1429
Lorenzo LazzeriDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-6204
Alessandra PanichiDipartimento di Biologia, dell'Università di Firenze, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Luigi StrianeseAssociazione Nazionale Libera Caccia, 58100 Grosseto, Italy.
Walid Fathy MohamedDepartment of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 11566, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-4568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of spatiotemporal partitioning is pivotal to shed light on interspecific coexistence. Most research effort has involved large-sized carnivores and their prey, whereas little attention has been devoted to lagomorphs. We assessed spatiotemporal overlap among the European brown hare

Indexed as

activity rhythmscamera-trapsLepus europaeusmoonlight avoidanceniche partitioningpredator–prey systemsspatiotemporal behavior

Identifiers

PMID33669965
PMCPMC7924828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.