Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669823›Full record

ReviewBiology2021

A New Perspective of

Zaki Saati-Santamaría, Raúl Rivas, Miroslav Kolařik, Paula García-Fraile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Unveiling the genomic potential ofMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zaki Saati-SantamaríaMicrobiology and Genetics Department, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-1316
Raúl RivasMicrobiology and Genetics Department, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2202-1470
Miroslav KolařikDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4016-0335
Paula García-FraileMicrobiology and Genetics Department, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-2184

Funding

Excellence Unit of the Spanish-Portuguese Institute for Agricultural Research (CIALE) CLU-2018-04Grantová agentura České republiky (GAČR) 19-09072S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiosis between microbes and insects has been raised as a promising area for understanding biological implications of microbe-host interactions. Among them, the association between fungi and bark beetles has been generally recognized as essential for the bark beetle ecology. However, many works investigating bark beetle bacterial communities and their functions usually meet in a common finding:

Indexed as

biocontrolDendroctonusforest pestsfungal antagonismhost–microbe interactioninsect–microbe interactionsinsects microbiomemicrobiotaScolytinaesymbionts

Identifiers

PMID33669823
PMCPMC7922261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.