Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669735›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Investigating the Effect of Imputed Structural Variants from Whole-Genome Sequence on Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction in Dairy Cattle.

Long Chen, Jennie E Pryce, Ben J Hayes, Hans D Daetwyler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Importance of genetic architecture in marker selection decisions for genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A 104-bp Structural Variation of theFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Long ChenAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Jennie E PryceAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Ben J HayesAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Hans D DaetwylerAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
AgriBio · AUAgriculture Victoria · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

DairyBio, Joint Venture between Agriculture Victoria, Dairy Australia and The Gardiner Foundation DairyBio16-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variations (SVs) are large DNA segments of deletions, duplications, copy number variations, inversions and translocations in a re-sequenced genome compared to a reference genome. They have been found to be associated with several complex traits in dairy cattle and could potentially help to improve genomic prediction accuracy of dairy traits. Imputation of SVs was performed in individuals genotyped with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels without the expense of sequencing them. In this study, we generated 24,908 high-quality SVs in a total of 478 whole-genome sequenced Holstein and Jersey cattle. We imputed 4489 SVs with R2 > 0.5 into 35,568 Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle with 578,999 SNPs with two pipelines, FImpute and Eagle2.3-Minimac3. Genome-wide association studies for production, fertility and overall type with these 4489 SVs revealed four significant SVs, of which two were highly linked to significant SNP. We also estimated the variance components for SNP and SV models for these traits using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). Furthermore, we assessed the effect on genomic prediction accuracy of adding SVs to GBLUP models. The estimated percentage of genetic variance captured by SVs for production traits was up to 4.57% for milk yield in bulls and 3.53% for protein yield in cows. Finally, no consistent increase in genomic prediction accuracy was observed when including SVs in GBLUP.

Indexed as

accuracygenome sequencegenome-wide association studiesgenomic predictiongenomic selectionstructural variants

Identifiers

PMID33669735
PMCPMC7922624
OpenAlexW3131925919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.