Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669716›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

A Qualitative Study of the Cognitive Rehabilitation Program GRADIOR for People with Cognitive Impairment: Outcomes of the Focus Group Methodology.

Eider Irazoki, Mª Cruz Sánchez-Gómez, Leslie María Contreras-Somoza, José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán, Mª Victoria Martín-Cilleros, Sonia Verdugo-Castro, Cristina Jenaro-Río, Manuel A Franco-Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eider IrazokiDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, Campus Ciudad Jardín, University of Salamanca, Avenida de la Merced, 109, 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7716-3989
Mª Cruz Sánchez-GómezDepartment of Didactic, Organization and Research Method, University of Salamanca, Paseo Canalejas, 169, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4726-7143
Leslie María Contreras-SomozaDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, Campus Ciudad Jardín, University of Salamanca, Avenida de la Merced, 109, 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-6918
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánDepartment of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation, Carretera de la Hiniesta 137, 49024 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-3150
Mª Victoria Martín-CillerosDepartment of Didactic, Organization and Research Method, University of Salamanca, Paseo Canalejas, 169, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Sonia Verdugo-CastroDepartment of Didactic, Organization and Research Method, University of Salamanca, Paseo Canalejas, 169, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-1747
Cristina Jenaro-RíoDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, Campus Ciudad Jardín, University of Salamanca, Avenida de la Merced, 109, 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-1658
Manuel A Franco-MartínDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, Campus Ciudad Jardín, University of Salamanca, Avenida de la Merced, 109, 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-2523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, technology has been implemented in the field of interventions for older adults. GRADIOR 4.5 is a cognitive software within the wide variety of available multimedia programs that support healthcare professionals in cognitive assessment and neuropsychological rehabilitation. The study aimed to evaluate the new version of GRADIOR (v4.5) based on the experience of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), people with dementia (PWD), and healthcare professionals. A qualitative study using the focus group methodology was carried out involving 13 people with MCI, 13 PWD, and 11 healthcare professionals. An analysis of the content and the level of feedback was performed. The study showed that GRADIOR 4.5 might be sufficiently adapted to PWD and people with MCI. Participants were motivated to use GRADIOR 4.5, showed high acceptability of the software, and a positive attitude towards technology. However, healthcare professionals suggested significant improvements to the software. GRADIOR 4.5 appeared to be a promising intervention that, because of its positive experience and acceptability, could be systematically implemented to complement cognitive rehabilitation interventions for older adults with MCI and dementia. Finally, it is advisable to consider the suggestions gathered in this study for future developments.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentcognitive rehabilitationcomputer-based interventiondementiafocus grouppsychosocial intervention

Identifiers

PMID33669716
PMCPMC7922357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.