Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669656›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

In Vivo Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Methods: Recent Technical Progress and Future Perspectives.

Asako Noguchi, Yuji Ikegaya, Nobuyoshi Matsumoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Biophysical Mechanisms of Vaginal Smooth Muscle Contraction: The Role of the Membrane Potential and Ion Channels.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Patch-seq: Advances and Biological Applications.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asako NoguchiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yuji IkegayaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Nobuyoshi MatsumotoGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-9416

Funding

Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology JPMJER1801Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H05525Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K15926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain functions are fundamental for the survival of organisms, and they are supported by neural circuits consisting of a variety of neurons. To investigate the function of neurons at the single-cell level, researchers often use whole-cell patch-clamp recording techniques. These techniques enable us to record membrane potentials (including action potentials) of individual neurons of not only anesthetized but also actively behaving animals. This whole-cell recording method enables us to reveal how neuronal activities support brain function at the single-cell level. In this review, we introduce previous studies using in vivo patch-clamp recording techniques and recent findings primarily regarding neuronal activities in the hippocampus for behavioral function. We further discuss how we can bridge the gap between electrophysiology and biochemistry.

Indexed as

HippocampusNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesAction PotentialsAnimalsMembrane Potentialsaxondendritehippocampuslocal field potentialmembrane potentialmouseneocortexpatch-clamp recordingratwhole-cell recording

Identifiers

PMID33669656
PMCPMC7922023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.