Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669642›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction Using an Epidemiological Risk Assessment Model and Polygenic Risk Score.

Boyoung Park, Sarah Yang, Jeonghee Lee, Il Ju Choi, Young-Il Kim, Jeongseon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk prediction model for gastric cancer within 5 years in healthy Korean adults.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Risk Prediction Models for Gastric Cancer: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024
    Article
  5. Evaluation of polygenic risk score for risk prediction of gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Prediction of gastric cancer risk by a polygenic risk score ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boyoung ParkDepartment of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.
Sarah YangDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.
Jeonghee LeeDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.
Il Ju ChoiCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8339-9824
Young-Il KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.
Jeongseon KimDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-2686

Funding

National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning no. 1410260 and NRF-2016R1C1B1013621, 2018R1D1A1A09083876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the performance of a gastric cancer (GC) risk assessment model in combination with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a polygenic risk score (PRS) in consideration of

Indexed as

polygenic risk scorerisk assessmentstomach neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID33669642
PMCPMC7923020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.