Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669454›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

The Focal Attention Window Size Explains Letter Substitution Errors in Reading.

Roberta Daini, Silvia Primativo, Andrea Albonico, Laura Veronelli, Manuela Malaspina, Massimo Corbo, Marialuisa Martelli, Lisa S Arduino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberta DainiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1055-8353
Silvia PrimativoDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9632-850X
Andrea AlbonicoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1975-0824
Laura VeronelliDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, 20144 Milan, Italy.
Manuela MalaspinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, 20144 Milan, Italy.
Marialuisa MartelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Lisa S ArduinoDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquired Neglect Dyslexia is often associated with right-hemisphere brain damage and is mainly characterized by omissions and substitutions in reading single words. Martelli et al. proposed in 2011 that these two types of error are due to different mechanisms. Omissions should depend on neglect plus an oculomotor deficit, whilst substitutions on the difficulty with which the letters are perceptually segregated from each other (i.e., crowding phenomenon). In this study, we hypothesized that a deficit of focal attention could determine a pathological crowding effect, leading to imprecise letter identification and consequently substitution errors. In Experiment 1, three brain-damaged patients, suffering from peripheral dyslexia, mainly characterized by substitutions, underwent an assessment of error distribution in reading pseudowords and a T detection task as a function of cue size and timing, in order to measure focal attention. Each patient, when compared to a control group, showed a deficit in adjusting the attentional focus. In Experiment 2, a group of 17 right-brain-damaged patients were asked to perform the focal attention task and to read single words and pseudowords as a function of inter-letter spacing. The results allowed us to confirm a more general association between substitution-type reading errors and the performance in the focal attention task.

Indexed as

crowding phenomenonfocal attentionneglect dyslexiasingle word readingsubstitution errors

Identifiers

PMID33669454
PMCPMC7920487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.