Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669434›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Rapid Manufacturing of Multilayered Microfluidic Devices for Organ on a Chip Applications.

Roberto Paoli, Davide Di Giuseppe, Maider Badiola-Mateos, Eugenio Martinelli, Maria Jose Lopez-Martinez, Josep Samitier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto PaoliNanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 12 Baldiri Reixac 15-21, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1062-0401
Davide Di GiuseppeDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1731-8678
Maider Badiola-MateosNanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 12 Baldiri Reixac 15-21, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-149X
Eugenio MartinelliDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6673-2066
Maria Jose Lopez-MartinezNanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 12 Baldiri Reixac 15-21, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4009-6206
Josep SamitierNanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 12 Baldiri Reixac 15-21, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-3679
Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

Catalonia Trade and Investment; Generalitat de Catalunya AdvanceCat and Base3DCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina CIBER ActionsCommission for Universities and Research of the Department of Innovation, Universities, and Enterprise of the Generalitat de Catalunya 2017 SGR 1079Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness TEC2015-70104-P, CTQ2016-75870-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfabrication and Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) soft-lithography techniques became popular for microfluidic prototyping at the lab, but even after protocol optimization, fabrication is yet a long, laborious process and partly user-dependent. Furthermore, the time and money required for the master fabrication process, necessary at any design upgrade, is still elevated. Digital Manufacturing (DM) and Rapid-Prototyping (RP) for microfluidics applications arise as a solution to this and other limitations of photo and soft-lithography fabrication techniques. Particularly for this paper, we will focus on the use of subtractive DM techniques for Organ-on-a-Chip (OoC) applications. Main available thermoplastics for microfluidics are suggested as material choices for device fabrication. The aim of this review is to explore DM and RP technologies for fabrication of an OoC with an embedded membrane after the evaluation of the main limitations of PDMS soft-lithography strategy. Different material options are also reviewed, as well as various bonding strategies. Finally, a new functional OoC device is showed, defining protocols for its fabrication in Cyclic Olefin Polymer (COP) using two different RP technologies. Different cells are seeded in both sides of the membrane as a proof of concept to test the optical and fluidic properties of the device.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsMicrotechnologyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymersPolymersdigital manufacturingmicrofluidicsorgan on a chiprapid prototyping

Identifiers

PMID33669434
PMCPMC7920479
OpenAlexW3129400047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.